Independent Article
 
   
 
   
 

10   March 10,1999                                                       FOOD LABELING & NUTRITION NEWS

Proposed soy protein CHD health claim criticized by FDA's toxicology center

FDA's National Center for Toxicological Research says it does not support the agency's proposed health claim linking soy protein consumption with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease because research shows some soy isoflavones are toxic.

Some soy isoflavones, including genistein, demonstrate toxicity in the human thyroid and in tissues sensitive to estrogen, Daniel Sheehan, director of the center's Estrogen Base Program, Division of Genetic and Reproductive Toxicology, told FDAs Office of Special Nutritionals Feb. 18.

Considering the current evidence on the toxicity of some soy isoflavones, it is inappropriate and unreasonable to approve a soy protein/CHD health claim at this time, Sheehan wrote.

FDAs Office of Special Nutritionals proposed the soy protein/CHD health claim for food labels in the Nov. 10 Federal Register. The claim would be permitted on labels of foods that contain at least 6.25 grams of soy protein per serving (See FLNN, Nov. 11, Page 8).

Sheehan cited research indicating that the soy isoflavone genistein causes estrogenic responses in developing and adult animals and in adult humans. Research indicates that during pregnancy in humans, soy isoflavones could be a risk factor for abnormal brain and reproductive tract development, he added.

"Furthermore, pregnant Rhesus monkeys fed genistein had serum estradiol (an estrogenic hormone) levels 50-100% higher than the controls.

Given that the Rhesus monkey is the best experimental model for humans, and that women's own estrogens are a very significant risk factor for breast cancer, it is unreasonable to approve the health claim until complete safety studies of soy protein are conducted," Sheehan wrote.

Also of serious concern is the finding that fetuses of monkeys fed genistein had a 70% higher serum estradiol level than did the controls, Sheehan said, adding that about 50% of the female offspring and a smaller fraction of male offspring displayed one or more malformations in the reproductive tract.

  He said soy isoflavones may also cause thyroid abnormalities, including goiter and autoimmune thyroiditis. Sheehan said there is a significant body of animal data that demonstrates goitrogenic and even carcinogenic effects of soy products; and there are significant reports of goitrogenic effects from soy consumption in human infants and adults.

Sheehan cited a study showing that children who received soy formulas as infants were twice as likely to develop autoimmune thyroiditis compared to children who received other forms of milk.

Long-term consumption of soy products may cause dementia: Sheehan

Sheehan said initial data from a study in Hawaii found that Hawaiian men and Japanese men showed a significant dose-dependent risk for development of dementia, caused by the deterioration of blood vessels in the brain, and brain atrophy from consumption of tofu, a soy product rich in isoflavones.

He said the Hawaii study provides evidence that soy (tofu) phytoestrogens cause dementia, and it is important given the great difficulty in discerning the relationship between exposures and long latency adverse effects in the human population.

"While isoflavones may have beneficial effects at some ages or circumstances, this cannot be assumed to be true at all ages. Isoflavones are like other estrogens in that they are two-edged swords, conferring both benefits and risk. The health labeling of soy protein isolate for foods needs to be considered just as would the addition of any estrogen or goitrogen to foods, which are bad ideas," Sheehan wrote.

Sheehan also pointed out that a claim made in the Nov. 10 Federal Register notice that soy protein relationship between exposures and long latency adverse effects in the human population.

That soy foods are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) is in conflict with the Center of Food Safety and Applied Nutrition's recent return of a petition requesting GRAS status for soy protein. The petition was returned because of deficiencies in reporting adverse effects, he said, adding that GRAS status has not been granted. (*9FLN 2204, 7 pages, $6).

Documents flagged with a* can be ordered through Documents Express by calling 202-887-6320